Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
2.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 20117, 2022 Nov 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2133630

ABSTRACT

SARS-CoV-2 gains cell entry via angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) 2, a membrane-bound enzyme of the "alternative" (alt) renin-angiotensin system (RAS). ACE2 counteracts angiotensin II by converting it to potentially protective angiotensin 1-7. Using mass spectrometry, we assessed key metabolites of the classical RAS (angiotensins I-II) and alt-RAS (angiotensins 1-7 and 1-5) pathways as well as ACE and ACE2 concentrations in 159 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, stratified by disease severity (severe, n = 76; non-severe: n = 83). Plasma renin activity (PRA-S) was calculated as the sum of RAS metabolites. We estimated ACE activity using the angiotensin II:I ratio (ACE-S) and estimated systemic alt-RAS activation using the ratio of alt-RAS axis metabolites to PRA-S (ALT-S). We applied mixed linear models to assess how PRA-S and ACE/ACE2 concentrations affected ALT-S, ACE-S, and angiotensins II and 1-7. Median angiotensin I and II levels were higher with severe versus non-severe COVID-19 (angiotensin I: 86 versus 30 pmol/L, p < 0.01; angiotensin II: 114 versus 58 pmol/L, p < 0.05), demonstrating activation of classical RAS. The difference disappeared with analysis limited to patients not taking a RAS inhibitor (angiotensin I: 40 versus 31 pmol/L, p = 0.251; angiotensin II: 76 versus 99 pmol/L, p = 0.833). ALT-S in severe COVID-19 increased with time (days 1-6: 0.12; days 11-16: 0.22) and correlated with ACE2 concentration (r = 0.831). ACE-S was lower in severe versus non-severe COVID-19 (1.6 versus 2.6; p < 0.001), but ACE concentrations were similar between groups and correlated weakly with ACE-S (r = 0.232). ACE2 and ACE-S trajectories in severe COVID-19, however, did not differ between survivors and non-survivors. Overall RAS alteration in severe COVID-19 resembled severity of disease-matched patients with influenza. In mixed linear models, renin activity most strongly predicted angiotensin II and 1-7 levels. ACE2 also predicted angiotensin 1-7 levels and ALT-S. No single factor or the combined model, however, could fully explain ACE-S. ACE2 and ACE-S trajectories in severe COVID-19 did not differ between survivors and non-survivors. In conclusion, angiotensin II was elevated in severe COVID-19 but was markedly influenced by RAS inhibitors and driven by overall RAS activation. ACE-S was significantly lower with severe COVID-19 and did not correlate with ACE concentrations. A shift to the alt-RAS axis because of increased ACE2 could partially explain the relative reduction in angiotensin II levels.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Peptide Hormones , Humans , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 , Renin-Angiotensin System , Angiotensin I , Angiotensin II , SARS-CoV-2 , Renin , Antihypertensive Agents
3.
BMJ Open ; 12(10): e062176, 2022 10 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2064155

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: As part of a randomised controlled trial, this qualitative study aimed to identify experiences and challenges of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 during illness and treatment (objective 1: COVID-19-related perspectives; objective 2: trial participation-related perspectives). DESIGN: Semistructured interviews following a prespecified interview guide, transcribed verbatim and analysed in accordance with the grounded theory process. Investigator triangulation served to ensure rigour of the analysis. SETTING: Interviews were embedded in a multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, open-label platform trial testing efficacy and safety of experimental therapeutics for patients with COVID-19 (Austrian Corona Virus Adaptive Clinical Trial). PARTICIPANTS: 20 patients (60±15 years) providing 21 interviews from 8 June 2020 to 25 April 2021. RESULTS: Qualitative data analysis revealed four central themes with subthemes. Theme 1, 'A Severe Disease', related to objective 1, was characterised by subthemes 'symptom burden', 'unpredictability of the disease course', 'fear of death' and 'long-term aftermaths with lifestyle consequences'. Theme 2, 'Saved and Burdened by Hospitalization', related to objective 1, comprised patients describing their in-hospital experience as 'safe haven' versus 'place of fear', highlighting the influence of 'isolation'. Theme 3, 'Managing One's Own Health', related to objective 1, showed how patients relied on 'self-management' and 'coping' strategies. Theme 4, 'Belief in Medical Research', related to objective 2, captured patients' 'motivation for study participation', many expressing 'information gaps' and 'situational helplessness' in response to study inclusion, while fewer mentioned 'therapy side-effects' and provided 'study reflection'. Investigator triangulation with an expert focus group of three doctors who worked at the study centre confirmed the plausibility of these results. CONCLUSIONS: Several of the identified themes (2, 3, 4) are modifiable and open for interventions to improve care of patients with COVID-19. Patient-specific communication and information is of utmost importance during clinical trial participation, and was criticised by participants of the present study. Disease self-management should be actively encouraged. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04351724.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hospitalization , Hospitals , Humans , Qualitative Research , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 9: 856891, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1834451

ABSTRACT

The assessment of systemic corticosteroid effects on intrapulmonary disease biomarkers is challenging. This retrospective evaluation of a human endotoxemia model quantified ACE2 and fibrin degradation product (FDP) concentrations in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT01714427). Twenty-four healthy volunteers received either 2 × 40 mg intravenous dexamethasone or placebo. These doses were administered 12 h apart prior to bronchoscopy-guided intrabronchial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation (control: saline into the contralateral lung segment). We quantified ACE2 concentration, the Angiotensin-II-to-Angiotensin-1-7 conversion rate as well as FDP in BALF 6 h after LPS instillation. In placebo-treated subjects, LPS instillation increased ACE2 concentrations compared to unstimulated lung segments [1,481 (IQR: 736-1,965) vs. 546 (413-988) pg/mL; p = 0.016]. Dexamethasone abolished the increase in ACE2 concentrations (p=0.13). Accordingly, LPS instillation increased the Angiotensin-II-to-Angiotensin-1-7 conversion capacity significantly in the placebo cohort, indicating increased enzymatic activity (p = 0.012). FDP increased following LPS-instillation [8.9 (2.7-12.2) vs. 6.6 (0.9-9.6) ng/mL, p = 0.025] in the placebo group, while dexamethasone caused a shut-down of fibrinolysis in both lung segments. LPS instillation increased ACE2 concentration, its enzymatic activity and FDP, which was mitigated by systemic dexamethasone treatment. Our results strengthen previously published findings regarding the efficiency of corticosteroids for the treatment of COVID-19-induced acute lung injury.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL